Saturday, December 14, 2013

Top Twenty-Five Christmas Movies

Here's my list of the TOP TWENTY-FIVE CHRISTMAS MOVIES of all time...  or at least, the first twenty-five that popped into my head, because let's face it, there are so many, there's no way I could see, let alone remember all of them.  (I heard that "Fred Claus" is good, but I haven't seen that one yet.)

First, let me give an honorable mention to movies that aren't about Christmas per se, but just happen to be taking place at Christmastime:

DIE HARD (1988):  Bruce Willis fights terrorists who take over an office building.  Yippee ki yay, motherfucker!

TOYS (1992):  A toy factor is taken over by a military maniac.  It's got Robin Williams in it.  What's not to love?

WHITE CHRISTMAS (1954):  Bing Crosby and Danny Kaye take a trip to Vermont.  Can't go wrong.

BLACK CHRISTMAS (1974):  A sorority is terrorized by a serial killer.  Merry Christmas.

HOME ALONE (1990):  Macaulay Culkin defends his house against burglars.  Good movie, but skip the sequels.

Okay, now for the top twenty-five ACTUAL Christmas movies:

#25...
SANTA CLAUS (1958):  This is one of those "so bad it's good" movies.  Santa has to deliver the toys, but the devil tries to stop him.  It's a Mexican-made kid's movie, chock full of WTF moments.

#24...
BAD SANTA (2003):  Billy Bob Thornton as the worst mall Santa ever.  The kid was kind of annoying, but Billy was good.

#23...
RUDOLPH THE RED-NOSED REINDEER (1964):  Not just by itself, mind you, but combined with the entire series including "Rudolph's Shiny New Year," "Rudolph and Frosty's Christmas in July," and "A Year Without a Santa Claus..." and what the hell, let's throw "Santa Claus is Coming to Town" into the mix... and "Frosty the Snowman."  They're all basically part of the same series... sort of.

#22...
THE SANTA CLAUSE 1, 2 & 3:  Actually, the best part was seeing the trailer for the first time.  Tim Allen has to take over for Santa Claus?  Use your imagination.  (The actual movie isn't too bad either.)

#21...
ERNEST SAVES CHRISTMAS (1988):  Do you like stupid stuff?  Good, because it doesn't get any stupider than the Ernest movies.

#20...
EBBIE (1995):  One of the million modern updates to "A Christmas Carol," this time with Ebbie Scrooge (Susan Lucci) as a department store owner.

#19...
THE CHRISTMAS SECRET (2000):  Who knew that Santa Claus's existence could have such a modern, scientific take?

#18...
SANTA CLAUS, THE MOVIE (1985):  The first half of the movie is probably one of the best Santa Claus origin stories you'll see.  The second half is kind of silly, but John Lithgow makes it good.

17...
A CHRISTMAS CAROL (1951):  The Alastair Sim version.  This is the one that all future versions are imitating.
16...
NATIONAL LAMPOON'S CHRISTMAS VACATION (1989):  One of those extremely rare occurrences in movies where there's a sequel that's better than the original.  Sure, "Family Vacation" was good, and "European Vacation" was okay, but this is... um... the Christmas one.  (P.S. Nobody gives a crap about "Vegas Vacation.")

15...
A CHRISTMAS CAROL (1999):  The Patrick Stewart version.  Stewart played a one-man performance of Charles Dickens for quite a long time before doing this.  It's definitely one of the better versions.

14...
THE MUPPET CHRISTMAS CAROL (1992):  Michael Caine as Scrooge and Gonzo as Charles Dickens.  'Nuff said.

13...
SANTA BABY (2006):  Jenny McCarthy as Santa's daughter, trying to make Christmas even better.  The sequel isn't bad either.

12...
SANTA CLAUS CONQUERS THE MARTIANS (1964):  The title says it all.  It's stupid... so stupid that you can't help but love it.  I recommend the MST3K version.

11...
A CHRISTMAS STORY (1983):  "You'll shoot your eye out!" is just one of about a million quotable lines from this classic.

10...
SCROOGED (1988):  Bill Murray experiences "A Christmas Carol" WHILE producing a performance of "A Christmas Carol."  Meta enough for you?

9...
THE HEBREW HAMMER (2003):  Adam Goldberg is a Jewish secret agent out to stop an evil Santa Claus (Andy Dick) from destroying Hanukkah.  "Shalom, motherfucker!"
8...
MIRACLE ON 34TH STREET (1947):  Santa comes to New York City to teach the meaning of Christmas.  It's a classic.  (The remakes are decent too.)

7...
IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE (1946):  Jimmy Stewart sees the world as if he'd never been born.  Not only one of the best Christmas movies ever, but one of the best movies of all time.  If I were being objective, this would probably be number one.

6...
SANTA AND PETE (1999):  Black Peter's travels with St. Nicholas from Holland to America.  How cool is that?

5...
THE LIFE AND ADVENTURES OF SANTA CLAUS (1985):  Another Santa Claus origin story.  This one is based on the book by L. Frank Baum.

4...
A CHRISTMAS CAROL (1984):  The George C. Scott version.  Definitely the best version.

3...
RISE OF THE GUARDIANS (2012):  Jack Frost joins the ranks of Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy and the Sandman in order to protect the world from the Boogie Man.  Santa kicks some serious ass in this one.

2...
HOGFATHER (2006):  When the Hogfather cannot deliver the toys to Discworld on Hogswatch, Death must take his place, while his granddaughter, Susan enters the Tooth Fairy's castle to stop an assassin from killing all the mythological persons with some help from the Wizards of the Unseen University, and Bilius, the Oh-God of Hangovers.  Yeah, it's pretty complicated, but it's fucking awesome!

1...
THE NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS (1993):  Jack Skellington, the king of Halloween, has decided to take over Christmas.  I think anyone who knows me could have guessed that this would be my number one.

AND NOW FOR THE TOP FIVE WORST CHRISTMAS MOVIES:

#5: Christmas Shoes.
#4: Christmas Shoes.
#3: Christmas Shoes.
#2: A Diva's Christmas Carol (which was basically just a promotion for VH1's Behind the Music)
#1: Christmas Shoes


Friday, November 29, 2013

Ways to Confuse People

Ever feel like confusing the hell out of people for no reason?  Here's what you do.  Walk up behind someone in a public area.  Make sure you're close enough that they can hear you, but still far enough away to get out of sight before they turn around.  Then say any one of the following phrases:

* It's getting late.  I still have to get home and rotate the kitchen cupboards.
* I hope it rains later.  I'm trying to dry out the lawn.
* Well, I knew he was cheating on his taxes as soon as I saw the mustard in the fish tank.
* Did you hear about those kids who got high from sniffing dog turds?
* He died of a stroke caused by an ice cream headache.  (Works best if the other person is eating ice cream.)
* Thirty-seven bags of marshmallows.  I think you can guess where he was going.
* Thank God you farted!
* They bombed where?!

As soon as they hear you, you duck out of hiding, so they never get ask you to explain yourself.

Saturday, October 19, 2013

What I Expected and What I Got

When I was little, I was told what to expect in the twenty-first century.  Here's a list of things I expected, and what I actually got instead:

* FLYING CARS - Instead of flying cars, we got "smart" cars.  They can pick out a restaurant, tell you when to turn, perfectly balance fuel consumption per wheel, and keep you alive and call for help in a crash.  That's all well and good, but they STILL CAN'T FUCKING FLY!

* THE TENTH PLANET - I grew up with nine planets in the solar system, but we all knew there was a tenth one out there, just waiting to be discovered as soon as our telescope technology improved.  We finally improved our telescopes, and instead of a tenth planet, we LOST ONE!  There are now only EIGHT planets.  By the way, does anybody else think it's kind of a creepy coincidence that Pluto got kicked out of the solar system around the same time as the color indigo got kicked out of the rainbow?

* THE FIFTY-FIRST STATE - We were all set to add that new star to the American flag, but it hasn't happened yet, and now we have states talking about breaking away from the United States.  Nobody is taking it too seriously yet, but I think there's a much better chance of losing Texas than gaining Puerto Rico these days.

* BUBBLE-DOME CITIES - Perfect climate-controlled environments.  Well, we don't have bubble domes protecting our cities, but we DID manage to lose a chunk of our ozone layer, which means that we're now LESS covered than we were before.

* RAY GUNS - Lasers, disrupters, phasers, death rays, light sabers...  Instead, we got drones.  I pictured a future in which soldiers wouldn't have bullets.  Now we have bullets without soldiers.

* WORLD WAR THREE - We all knew it was coming.  The U.S. and the Soviets would fire off their nuclear weapons, creating a post-apocalyptic wasteland full of mutants fighting for survival.  Instead, we got... the war on terror, a few Rapture cults, a bunch of zombie movies, and our biggest gripe with Russia is that they stopped being okay with gay people, right around the time we started.  I don't know what's real anymore.

* TELEPORTERS - Well, we don't have them yet, but we do have 3-D printers, which is kind of like a... well it's sort of a... okay, it's not the same thing at all.  I don't know anyone who has one yet anyway.

* HOLOGRAM TELEVISION - Let's be honest.  Television is dying.  Even with radical improvements such as recordable programs, clearer picture quality, and wider selection, it just cannot continue to compete with online video-on-demand.  Television will end without ever having been in 3-D, or having said "fuck."

* SPACESHIPS - We were going to have spaceships and moon colonies and Mars missions, and we were going to make contact with space aliens.  Instead, we shut down NASA, and start building a wall to keep human aliens out.  We also completely fucked up the education system.  Good job, guys.  At least we can count on deranged billionaires to keep working on the project.

* THE METRIC SYSTEM - Everyone in the future was going to be using the metric system because it's just so futuristic.  Actually, most of the world was already using the metric system, except for the United States, and I don't see us changing anytime soon, because it's just not practical.  Who wants to tear out all the road signs and re-price all the products in stores, just to make calculations a little easier to do without a calculator... even though everyone has a calculator?  Also, Celsius temperature sucks.  No one needs to know how close the weather is to the boiling point of water.

* LOTS MORE SMOG - There's lots less, and yet, people are more pissed off about how much pollution there is.  Explain that to me.  People are choking to death, and it's a mild annoyance, but a faint trace of gas that you need a machine to detect, and we're ready to start a riot.

* INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE - Esperanto?  Interlang?  Some other manufactured language to be "fair" to everybody?  Nope, instead, everyone just started speaking English.  Yeah, remember that really stupid language that was supposedly almost impossible to learn because its rules weren't consistent?  That's what everyone speaks now.  Who saw that coming?

* ROBOTS - There were supposed to be humanoid robots doing all our housework for us.  The closest thing we got is a rolling frisbee that can sort of vacuum.

* ORWELLIAN NEWSPEAK - Well, we had a politically-correct phase, but it died out.  Now the only ones who use it are politicians, but that's nothing new.

* EVERYONE IS A SCIENTIFIC GENIUS - Instead, we got the Creationist museums, and an increase in the number of people practicing witchcraft.  (Not that I'm complaining about one of those.)

* WRIST PHONES - They were promising these things FOREVER!  And now, we FINALLY HAVE THEM............ right after everyone has a smart phone in their pockets, and nobody wears wristwatches anymore.  Better late than never?

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Religion Quiz

Let's see if I can figure out which belief system you belong to (or should belong to, if undecided.)


1 Is there an intelligent power in the world that is beyond humans?
 Yes - Go to 2.
 No - Go to 3.
 Maybe - You are AGNOSTIC.

2 Is it from another planet?
 Yes - Go to 4.
 No - Go to 5.

3 Should people be allowed to own property?
 Yes - Go to 6.
 No - You are a MARXIST.

4 Are we clones of them?
 Yes - You are RAELEAN.
 No - Go to 7.

5 Are there many different gods?
 Yes - Go to 8.
 No - Go to 9.

6 Does life have any value whatsoever?
 Yes - Go to 89.
 No - You are NIHILIST.

7 Are their thetans inside us?
 Yes - You are SCIENTOLOGIST.
 No - Go to 10.

8 Are humans and gods both part of a single unifying force?
 Yes - Go to 11.
 No - Go to 12.

9 Did your higher power create the universe?
 Yes - Go to 13.
 No - Go to 14.

10 Are aliens coming for us?
 Yes - You are a UFO CULT.
 No - Go to 15.

11 Do you believe in reincarnation?
 Yes - Go to 16.
 No - You are UNCLASSIFIED.

12 Do your gods come from Japan?
 Yes - Go to 105.
 No - Go to 17.

13 Does God answer prayers?
 Yes - Go to 18.
 No - You are DEIST.

14 Is your higher power the spirits of your ancestors?
 Yes - Go to 19.
 No - Go to 20.

15 Are space aliens and angels of God the same things?
 Yes - You are AETHERIAN.
 No - You are UNCLASSIFIED.

16 Do you incorporate many Western traditions into your beliefs?
 Yes - Go to 81.
 No - Go to 21.

17 Do you cast spells?
 Yes - Go to 22.
 No - Go to 23.

18 Do you believe in the Old Testament (Torah)?
 Yes - Go to 24.
 No - Go to 25.

19 Do you use shamanic rituals to communicate with them?
 Yes - Go to 26.
 No - Go to 27.

20 Is your higher power the Universe itself?
 Yes - Go to 91.
 No - Go to 38.

21 Do you live by the wisdom of Confucius?
 Yes - You are CONFUCIAN.
 No - Go to 28.

22 Does your ritual originate from Western Africa?
 Yes - You are VOUDON.
 No - Go to 29.

23 Do the legends of your gods come from Europe?
 Yes - Go to 30.
 No - Go to 31.

24 Do you believe in the New Testament (Gospels)?
 Yes - Go to 32.
 No - Go to 33.

25 Do you follow the teachings of Zoroaster?
 Yes - You are ZOROASTRIAN.
 No - You are UNITARIAN-UNIVERSALIST.

26 Do your ancestral spirits come from the West?
 Yes - You are NATIVE AMERICAN.
 No - You are EASTERN SHAMANIST.

27 Do you rely on psychics or mediums?
 Yes - Go to 34.
 No - You are UNCLASSIFIED.

28 Do you live by the wisdom of Buddha?
 Yes - You are BUDDHIST.
 No - Go to 35.

29 Is your ritual based on Western Occultism?
 Yes - Go to 36.
 No - Go to 80.

30 Are your gods Greek, Roman or Etruscan?
 Yes - Go to 88.
 No - Go to 37.

31 Are your gods from the Egypt or the Middle East?
 Yes - Go to 39.
 No - Go to 40.

32 Do you believe in the Koran?
 Yes - Go to 104.
 No - Go to 42.

33 Do you believe that Haile Selassie I is the Messiah?
 Yes - You are RASTAFARIAN.
 No - Go to 43.

34 Does your preferred medium have a school of enlightenment?
 Yes - Go to 44.
 No - Go to 45.

35 Do you believe in the Veda?
 Yes - Go to 46.
 No - You are TAOIST.

36 Do you follow the Wiccan Rede?
 Yes - Go to 47.
 No - Go to 48.

37 Are your gods from the Norse tradition?
 Yes - Go to 49.
 No - Go to 50.

38 Does your higher power bring cargo?
 Yes - You are JOHN FRUM CULT.
 No - Go to 93.

39 Are your gods Egyptian?
 Yes - You are KEMETIC.
 No - You are MESOPOTAMPIAN.

40 Are your gods from America?
 Yes - Go to 51.
 No - Go to 52.

41 Do you believe in the Bab?
 Yes - Go to 53.
 No - Go to 54.

42 Do you believe in the Book of Mormon?
 Yes - You are MORMON.
 No - Go to 55.

43 Do you follow every law in Leviticus?
 Yes - You are ORTHODOX JEW.
 No - You are PROGRESSIVE JEW.

44 Is your belief system based on the Law of Attraction?
 Yes - Go to 56.
 No - Go to 57.

45 Do you derive philosophical conclusions from metaphysical observations?
 Yes - You are THEOSOPHIST.
 No - You are SPIRITUALIST.

46 Is Krishna the most important avatar?
 Yes - You are HARE KRISHNA.
 No - Go to 69.

47 Is feminism the most important aspect of your practice?
 Yes - You are DIANIC WICCAN.
 No - Go to 58.

48 Is your order founded by Aleistar Crowley?
 Yes - You are THELEMA.
 No - Go to 59.

49 Do you believe in cultural isolationism?
 Yes - You are ODALIST.
 No - Go to 60.

50 Are trees sacred to you?
 Yes - You are DRUID.
 No - You are CELTIC PAGAN.

51 Are your gods from Mexico?
 Yes - Go to 61.
 No - You are INCAN.

52 Are your gods from the Pacific?
 Yes - Go to 62.
 No - Go to 63.

53 Is Baha'u'lla the most important prophet?
 Yes - You are BAHA'I.
 No - You are BABIST.

54 Should political authority derive from religious authority?
 Yes - You are SUNNI MUSLIM.
 No - Go to 64.

55 Is the world around us an illusion created by our minds?
 Yes - You are NEW THOUGHT.
 No - Go to 86.

56 Has an ancient Atlantean warrior spirit come back to teach us?
 Yes - You are RAMTHAN.
 No - You are ABRAHAM-HICKS.

57 Do you believe some people are born Indigo?
 Yes - You are KRYON'S SCHOOL.
 No - You are UNCLASSIFIED.

58 Do you follow a structured initiatory British tradition?
 Yes - Go to 67.
 No - Go to 68.

59 Does membership in your order require being a Freemason?
 Yes - Go to 70.
 No - Go to 97.

60 Does your religion have a hierarchial structure?
 Yes - You are THEODIST.
 No - You are ASATRU.

61 Are your gods from the Yukatan region?
 Yes - You are MAYAN.
 No - You are AZTEC.

62 Are your gods Australian?
 Yes - You are ABORIGINE.
 No - You are POLYNESIAN.

63 Are your gods from Africa?
 Yes - You are AFRICAN ANIMIST.
 No - You are OTHER PAGAN.

64 Do you seek spritual enlightenment above materialism?
 Yes - You are SUFI.
 No - You are SHI'ITE.

65 Do you believe in heaven and hell?
 Yes - Go to 83.
 No - You are CHRISTADELPHIAN.

66 Is the Pope infallible?
 Yes - You are CATHOLIC.
 No - Go to 73.

67 Do you follow the traditions of Alex Saunders?
 Yes - You are ALEXANDRIAN WICCAN.
 No - You are GARDENARIAN WICCAN.

68 Are faeries an integral part of your practice?
 Yes - You are FAERIE WICCAN.
 No - Go to 74.

69 Is your spiritual path based on monastic aecetic living and ritual fasting?
 Yes - You are JAIN.
 No - Go to 75.

70 Was your order founded around the late 19th century?
 Yes - You are GOLDEN DAWN.
 No - You are ROSICRUTIAN.

71 Is your church completely independent of other churches?
 Yes - You are EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN.
 No - You are SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST.

72 Is humanity being punished for permitting homosexuality?
 Yes - You are WESTBORO BAPTIST.
 No - Go to 77.

73 Can anyone interpret the Bible individually?
 Yes - Go to 78.
 No - Go to 79.

74 Is your ritual based on Gavin Frost?
 Yes - You are CELTIC WICCAN.
 No - You are UNCLASSIFED WICCAN.

75 Do you follow the Five Ks?
 Yes - You are SIKH.
 No - You are HINDU.

76 Should baptism be performed on adults only?
 Yes - Go to 84.
 No - Go to 77.

77 Do you believe in the coming of the Rapture?
 Yes - Go back to 71.
 No - You are FUNDAMENTALIST.

78 Do you go to a church to help you understand the Bible?
 Yes - Go to 99.
 No - You are QUAKER.

79 Do you follow an ancient traditional interpretation of scripture?
 Yes - You are ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN.
 No - You are UNCLASSIFIED CHRISTIAN.

80 Do you invoke Aradia in your spells?
 Yes - You are STREGHERIA.
 No - You are UNCLASSIFIED.

81 Are you a reincarnation of a mythical being?
 Yes - You are OTHERKIN.
 No - Go to 82.

82 Do you rely on the guidance of spirit mediums?
 Yes - Go back to 34.
 No - You are UNCLASSIFIED NEW AGE.

83 Do you celebrate Christmas?
 Yes - Go to 76.
 No - Go to 90.

84 Is agrarian living integral to spiritual growth?
 Yes - You are MENNONITE.
 No - Go to 85.

85 Are things like faith-healing and speaking-in-tongues important to your faith?
 Yes - You are PENTECOSTALIST.
 No - You are BAPTIST.

86 Do you believe in The Exposition of the Divine Principle?
 Yes - You are UNIFICATIONIST.
 No - Go to 87.

87 Do you take the Bible literally?
 Yes - Go back to 65.
 No - Go back to 66.

88 Do you seek to create chaos and disorder?
 Yes - You are DISCORDIAN.
 No - You are HELLENIST.

89 Should people care more for each other than themselves?
 Yes - Go to 100.
 No - Go to 92.

90 Do you use electricity?
 Yes - You are JEHOVAH'S WITNESS.
 No - You are AMISH.

91 Are Zen and bowling important to your philosophy?
 Yes - You are DUDIST.
 No - You are PANTHEIST.

92 Do you perform Satanic rituals?
 Yes - You are LAVEYAN.
 No - You are OBJECTIVIST.

93 Do you use black magick?
 Yes - Go to 95.
 No - Go to 96.

95 Has Lucifer fallen from grace?
 Yes - You are DEVIL-WORSHIPER.
 No - You are LUCIFERIAN.

96 Do you use the Force?
 Yes - You are JEDI.
 No - You are UNCLASSIFED.

97 Do you use Egyptian dark magick?
 Yes - You are SETIAN.
 No - Go to 98.

98 Is the Loch Ness Monster important to your rituals?
 Yes - You are EARTH MAGICIAN.
 No - You are CHAOS MAGICIAN.

99 Does your church actively invite participation from differing belief systems?
 Yes - You are C-3 EXCHANGE.
 No - Go to 101.

100 Do you dress like a pirate?
 Yes - You are PASTAFARIAN.
 No - You are HUMANISTIC ATHEIST.

101 Are your churches overseen by an archbishop?
 Yes - You are ANGLICAN.
 No - Go to 102.

102 Is the Eucharist the true body of Christ?
 Yes - Go to 103.
 No - You are PRESBYTERIAN.

103 Do you use sacramental wine?
 Yes - You are LUTHERAN.
 No - You are METHODIST.

104 Do you believe in reincarnation?
 Yes - You are DRUZE.
 No - Go back to 41.

105 Is your preferred shrine founded by Nakayama Miki?
 Yes - You are TENRIKYO.
 No - You are SHINTOIST.

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Witch Movies

Just a few thoughts on the portrayal of witches in movies.  I won't be including movies where the witch is only in a minor role, or movies which I haven't seen.


MACBETH:  (1611) William Shakespeare's tale of a man who assassinates a king in order to steal his throne, but eventually gets his comeuppance.  The Wyrd Sisters in this play and all of its various movie adaptations have established in the popular culture the image of the three old crones chanting around the cauldron.  Much of Shakespeare's inspiration was taken (allegedly) from local witch folklore of the time, including specific spells, which is one of the reasons why many people today believe that the play is cursed.  The witches in this play are portrayed as not exactly evil, but simply mischievous, and upon being told by the goddess Hecate that their deeds have caused serious harm throughout the kingdom, use their same mischievous tactics to resolve the issue.

HÄXAN:  (1922) This Swedish-Danish-made silent movie serial is a documentary about the witch trials of the middle ages.  Although some of its historical accuracy is questionable, it does take a very mature look at how dangerous fear and superstition can be, and how lucky we are to be living in a modern age of science and reason.  One criticism I have is that it leaves out the impact of Pagan religions and practices, as well as the cultural history of the Christian religions.  It's sort of a "they didn't know any better" look at how all seemingly supernatural things can be scientifically explained, ignoring the fact that beliefs and practices of the supernatural still exist today.

SNOW WHITE AND THE SEVEN DWARFS:  (1937) There have been countless variations on the old Snow White story since time immemorial (i.e. the Middle Ages), but the 1937 Disney animated version is probably the most culturally significant, not only for being the most iconic image of Snow White, but more importantly, for being the first ever feature-length animation.  The evil queen in the story is fairly true to the old folk tale, in that her motivation is more about the evils of jealousy and vanity than the evils of witchcraft.  I think one of the most vilifying things about her, at least to American audiences, is the fact that she is a royal authority figure, and audiences always want to root for the underdog.  In other words, she's not an evil witch, but rather an evil queen who simply uses witchcraft as one of the weapons in her arsenal.  This same motif can be seen in later Disney movies such as "Sleeping Beauty."  Various later incarnations of the Snow White story have kept this theme.

THE WIZARD OF OZ:  (1939) Silent movies about the Land of Oz started being made almost immediately following the invention of movies, and L. Frank Baum, the creator of the Oz books, had his own movie production company.  The most well-known version, however, was MGM's 1939 Technicolor version starring Judy Garland.  Besides winning its share of awards, establishing MGM's reputation as the company that makes lavish musicals, and becoming one of the most beloved children's classics of all time, this is the movie that cemented the image of Oz (including the image of the Wicked Witch of the West) into the popular culture.  Do I really need to explain the plot?  Okay, Dorothy gets swept up by a tornado to a strange land, and needs the Wizard's help to get home.  There.  One of the things I like about this movie is the way witches are portrayed as having the potential to use their powers for good or evil.  The 1985 sequel "Return to Oz" starring Fairuza Balk, and the 2013 prequel "Oz the Great and Powerful" starring James Franco, complete the trilogy by adapting other Oz stories, but tying them into the story elements and visual styles of the 1939 version.  All three movies are excellent.

I MARRIED A WITCH:  (1942) In this light-hearted romantic comedy, a witch played by Veronica Lake, who was burned at the stake has just returned to take revenge on the direct descendant of her accuser.  He tries to slip him a love potion with the intent of spurning him, but instead is given the love potion herself.  She breaks up his intended wedding, elopes with him (inexplicably, as he had been rejecting her up until this point), and finally tells him that she is a witch, proving her power by rigging an election for him.  The whole while, her father is attempting to ruin him, even briefly attempting to frame him for murder.  The jokes are oddly spaced, the plot bounces all over the place, and the pacing is strange... possibly due to the fact that director Rene Clair had a background in avant-garde filmmaking.  This movie's big contribution it was one of the bases for the TV series "Bewitched."  In this movie, the witches are portrayed as very much inhuman.  This is reinforced by the husband's reaction when he learns the truth -- first refusing to believe that witches exist, then worrying about what would happen if the secret ever got out.  Again, this is similar to "Bewitched."

THE BELL, THE BOOK AND THE CANDLE:  (1958) This one is a romantic comedy starring Jimmy Stewart.  A witch, played by Kim Novak casts a love spell on Jimmy Stewart purely to spite his fiancé, who is an old enemy, but in the process, finds herself falling in love for real.  There is also a subplot about Jack Lemon attempting to publish a book about modern witchcraft for the general public.  There are some cliché elements regarding the inhumanity of witches.  In the mythology of this movie, witches cannot fall in love without risking losing their powers.  One thing about the movie which I do find very accurate is that there is no one "official" version of witchcraft.  In this movie, witches have a very loose subculture of various occult practitioners (astrology, theosophy, herbology, etc.) all learning from one another.  A researcher claims to know all there is to know, quoting a lot of medieval folklore (such as witches float in water), but Jack Lemon quickly comments how he has it "all wrong."  To the movie's credit, it doesn't bother to exposit on what the "right" lore is.

BEDKNOBS AND BROOMSTICKS:  (1971) A Disney movie combining live action with animation about a real witch, a fake witch and some children who use magick to fight off the Nazis.  The witch in this story, played by Angela Lansbury, flies on a broom, but other than that, is a pretty good portrayal of a witch, in that she is an otherwise ordinary person, but is learning to use witchcraft through study and some trial and error.  She has a natural talent which allows her to work spells that wouldn't work for other people.  It's a good kids' movie, and how often do you get to use the words "Disney" and "Nazis" in the same sentence?

THE TROUBLE WITH MISS SWITCH:  (1980) A made-for-TV animated children's special about a substitute teacher who is secretly a witch.  In this, and it's 1982 sequel, "Miss Switch to the Rescue," follows the fairly common tradition of witches as otherworldly beings, as well as the wicked witch who threatens the good witches.  Miss Switch does have the pointed hat and broom, but fortunately, does not appear green, ugly or wart-covered.  Also, she has a very strict and proper style about her -- a huge departure from the medieval "debaucherous" concept of a witch.

HALLOWEEN III:  SEASON OF THE WITCH:  (1982) This movie confused a lot of people, because it was not a sequel to "Halloween" or "Halloween II," but later Halloween movies continued the Michael Myers saga from the first two movies.  It is also the only movie to deal with witchcraft.  (So let's just ignore the first half of the title, because everyone else does.)  The plot is about a modern-day Irish Druid who wants to sacrifice children (using deadly Halloween masks) to the Pagan gods on the night of Samhain.  Fortunately, this doesn't attempt to represent any established neo-Pagan sects, but rather an individual attempting to restore Halloween to its Pagan origins.  I applaud this movie for not trying to make up a mythology, but instead having some real facts about the origins of Halloween.  (Granted, there is still a great deal not known about the Druids of ancient times, and most of what we do know about them comes from outside sources, such as the Romans.)

THE WORST WITCH:  (1986) A low-budget and overly cliché made-for-TV children's story about a witch school.  Fairuza Balk (again) plays a very poor student who gets picked on, but in the end, defeats a group of wicked witches.  It's stupid, but it's fun.  So what's the real payoff?  Why is this movie so popular?  Two words:  Tim Curry!  I mean, let's face it.  Time Curry makes anything awesome.

THE WITCHES OF EASTWICK:  (1987) Three small-town women (Cher, Susan Sarandon and Michelle Pfeiffer) discover they have natural powers, and use them to summon their ideal man, Jack Nicholson (as his absolute most Jack Nicholson-est).  After a series of misfortunes, the witches realize that Jack is the devil (or some sort of demon or evil sorcerer... it isn't really explained) and use their newfound powers to banish him.  This movie doesn't get into what exactly a "witch" is, aside from having powers, which gives it a very universal quality.  The only spell that is specifically explained is the use of a poppet, which is done accurately.

DRAGNET:  (1987) While not a movie about witchcraft per se, it does include Pagans.  Here, "Pagan" is an acronym for "People Against Normality And Goodness."  The movie is basically making fun of the stiffness of the original TV series, playing the hero (Dan Aykroyd) as the old-fashioned by-the-book traditionalist.  Still, in a realistic context, there are and always will be posers who consider themselves occult just for the excuse of being nonconformist.

ELVIRA, MISTRESS OF THE DARK:  (1988) Anyone who grew up in the 80s knows Elvira from her Movie Macabre as well as her numerous TV appearances.  In this movie, Elvira plays "herself," discovering that she is the sole heir to a witches spellbook, and in the process, finds herself stuck in a small suburban town with exaggeratedly religious conservative people.  The movie is both an homage to classic horror and an excuse for a lot of tit jokes.  Elvira returned in 2001 for "Elvira's Haunted Hills," a parody of Roger Coreman's movie series on Edgar Allen Poe.  It's never made clear if this is a sequel, prequel or a completely unrelated story with the same character.

TEEN WITCH:  (1989) No, not the Wiccan instructional book by Silver Ravenwolf.  Teen Witch was a pathetic attempt to do a female version of the already popular 1985 movie "Teen Wolf."  It's the exact same story, except that instead of a werewolf winning the big basketball game, it's a witch winning over the hot guy... and there's rapping.  Aside from just being a really stupid movie, the portrayal of witches doesn't fall into the mythological or the modern categories.  She doesn't need to study or learn spells.  She just suddenly has godlike powers.

WARLOCK:  (1989) Another throwback to the medieval lore.  A witch-hunter from the middle ages returns to stop a warlock from finding a book which can unmake the universe.  The 1993 sequel "Warlock the Armageddon," focused on modern Druids.  Unlike "witch" movies, the Druids are a specific sect, so I put a little more pressure on them to be authentic.  In this story, the Druids are an order to prevent Satan from being unleashed onto the world, by keeping several sacred runestones safe.  Eh, close enough.

THE WITCHES:  (1990) This is a throwback to the fairy tale witch -- old, ugly and out to steal all the children.  Their evil plans are thwarted by a boy who has been turned into a mouse.  Many movie adaptations of Roald Dahl's books (Matilda, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, James and the Giant Peach) are fun for all ages, but "The Witches" is clearly just intended to be a mindless children's story.

THE ADDAMS FAMILY:  (1991) This movie, and its 1993 sequel, "Addams Family Values," are based on the 1964-1966 TV series, which were in turn, based on a series of New Yorker cartoons.  Originally, the concept was to juxtapose classic horror characters with modern suburban society.  The TV series was groundbreaking for its time (probably unintentionally) by breaking all sit-com clichés, and instead showing a psychologically normal and healthy family, who just happen to appear macabre and ghoulish and practice the occult.  The subtext (and sometimes plain text) of the show was about accepting people's differences.  The movies seemed to be going more for nostalgia factor as well as an indictment of superficial upper-class conformists.  One of the things I love about this movie is the way that individualism and occultism are treated as common everyday things by the Addams, and if anyone doesn't like it, it's their problem.

HOCUS-POCUS:  (1993)  This is a return to the fairy-tale witch who is inhuman and captures children.  Three witches (Bette Midler, Kathy Najimy and Sarah Jessica Parker) are brought back to life on Halloween.  Despite the old tired gag of people from the past being confused by modern technology, the movie is fun.  One of the major witch clichés in this movie is that it feels the need to "explain" why witches are present in the modern world, in this case, having been killed in the 17th century, but with an old curse that can bring them back to life.  (At least "The Witches" explained present-day witches as simply not being apparent.)

THE CRAFT:  (1996) Three teenagers dabble in witchcraft, but their power increases tremendously when they are joined by a fourth "natural" witch, played by Robin Tunney.  The other three (played by Neve Campbell, Rachel True and guess who... Fairuza Balk) become corrupted with power, misuse their witchcraft, and learn a harsh lesson.  All-in-all, a very good story.  Where this movie really shines, however, is in it's accurate portrayal of modern witchcraft, using specifically Wiccan rituals, but never explicitly stating that this is intended as an accurate portrayal of Wicca (or even saying the word "Wicca" at any point in the movie).  This is probably my favorite witch movie.  I should also point out that "The Craft" was the inspiration for the 1998-2006 TV series "Charmed" (even using a song used in the movie as the opening credits theme).  While I absolutely love "Charmed," the portrayal of witches is much more in line with medieval mysticism and demonology.  Ironic that a TV series which portrays Wicca without calling itself "Wicca," now has the Halliwell sisters explicitly calling themselves "Wiccan," but except for a handfasting ritual in one episode, there is nothing Wicca-related in the entire series.  Their practices have much more in common with Rose Cross or Golden Dawn or variants or even Santeria.

CASPER MEETS WENDY:  (1998) Didn't see it.

PRACTICAL MAGIC:  (1998) A romantic comedy with a few horror elements.  Two sisters (Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman) look for love, exorcise an evil spirit, and seek to gain acceptance in the community.  I love this movie.  The portrayal of witches is a pretty accurate fam-trad, acknowledging the variety of witchcraft practices in the community.

HALLOWEENTOWN:  (1998) You know those annoyingly colorful and happy Halloween decorations you seen on the homes of families with very young children?  Imagine a whole movie like that.  The characters are cartoonish, and the entire mythology of witches, vampires, werewolves, fairies, etc. all seem to have been reverse-engineered from children's costumes.  Basically, an evil force has been taking over the town, and the only way to break the curse is for a group of children to light the magic jack-o-lantern.  It's pretty stupid.

THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT:  (1999) Even if you haven't seen it, you pretty much know that it's a lot of running with a shaky hand camera, following a "witch" who is really just a local urban legend.  It's trying to be another "Final Broadcast," but without the analysis to make it interesting.  The "witch" is never even seen.  It's basically a novelty that might have worked better as a short film than a feature.  The 2000 sequel, "Book of Shadows, Blair Witch II," is more like a real movie, but has its share of what-the-fuck-is-going-on problems.  One of the characters in this movie is explicitly Wiccan, and this is my main pet peeve with this movie.  The Wiccan character is a little TOO accurate.  She's the typical self-important, uneducated, ill-informed, ultra-liberal, anti-establishment, preachy, blame-the-Christians-for-everything, fluffy bunny.  Unlike "The Craft," however, the young and inexperienced Wiccan isn't corrected.  Instead, she's just one of the victims of whatever-is-going-on.  The movie puts forth the worst example of a Wiccan, but framed as if this were the BEST example.  It's unintentionally insulting.

HARRY POTTER MOVIES:  (2001-2011) This series is about a young boy (Daniel Radcliff) who finds out he is a wizard.  (I have to wonder, if he wears a pointed hat and rides a broom, why not just call him a "witch?")  He grows up at Hogwarts, facing the evil forces of Voldemort.  It's a cool adventure story with coming-of-age elements, and my only real criticism of the series is that it's a little too long and drawn out for my tastes.  There's nothing to say about accurate portrayals, because it doesn't pretend to be anything more than a fantasy.

BEWITCHED:  (2005) This movie starring Will Ferrel and Nicole Kidman (again?) is mostly a parody of the original 1964-1972 TV series starring Elizabeth Montgomery.  The original TV series cemented the term "warlock" for male witches in the public consciousness (much to my chagrin), and like "Teen Witch" portrayed witches as being almost omnipotent.  (This carried over into the 1977-1978 spinoff series "Tabitha.")  Still, this was a good portrayal of witchcraft in a positive light, and the movie adaptation had a strong nostalgia factor for the original series (despite Will Ferrel's scenery-chewing).

THE BROTHERS GRIMM:  (2005) The Brothers Grimm were cultural historians who compiled local legends of witches and monsters.  In this adaptation, they're a couple of con artists who pass themselves off as witch-hunters, but meet their match when they encounter a real witch, who embodies a combination of several Grimm tales.  The movie is an innovative update to the old legends.

CHRONICLES OF NARNIA:  THE LION, THE WITCH AND THE WARDROBE:  (2005) This is a difficult movie to classify.  The story of four children who walk through a wardrobe into a magical realm is intended as a metaphor for the story of Jesus Christ, in which the lion Aslan represents Jesus and the White Witch represents Satan.  As far as storytelling goes, the rules are pointlessly complicated and the character motives make little to no sense, at least, without the events in the story having a religious context.  Basically, I need the Jesus story in order to clarify the Narnia story.  As for the witch, she is exactly what one would expect from a Christian traditionalist interpretation of Satan -- corrupting people for its own sake, and then punishing them for it later, being both the instigator and the prosecutor.  I don't think this is necessarily intended to be an indictment of witchcraft as evil (or especially of "white" witchcraft), but rather using the familiar image of a witch as the villain of a children's story.  I don't think the writers even considered that witches exist anywhere outside of fairy tales.  As for the sequels, I haven't seen them.

STARDUST:  (2007) This movie has all the style and imagination you would expect from a Neil Gaiman story.  A young man finds love in a fallen star (Claire Danes) after entering a strange land.  In two overlapping subplots, a group of heirs to the throne fight amongst each other over a necklace in the star's possession, and a group of witches attempt to steal the star's heart to regain their youth.  The main witch in this movie, played by Michelle Pfeiffer (once again), changes between a young and beautiful sorceress and a wicked old crone, reminiscent of the evil queen from Snow White.

DARK SHADOWS:  (2012) Based on the 1966-1971 TV series, and adapted by Tim Burton, this is the story of a vampire played by Johnny Depp (because, as I said, it's a Tim Burton movie), who was cursed by a witch.  Unlike the original series (as well as the 1991 reboot), which took itself very seriously, the 2012 movie is played mostly for laughs.  Many critics have called this Tim Burton's worst movie, but I like it.  The witch in this movie is a jilted lover who learned the art of witchcraft purely for revenge and personal gain.  Johnny Depp also studies the occult in order to protect himself and his family.  Here, witchcraft is seen as being simply a tool which can be used for good or ill, which is very accurate.  The witch becomes inhuman, for the most part, but this is apparently only an after-effect of her immortality spell.

Those are about all the ones that I've been thinking about recently.  I'm sure there will be more to follow.

Sunday, September 15, 2013